Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Digital assets as collateral in England and the US: priority and super-priority of security interests
© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All rights reserved.
"Tokenisation ... could streamline collateral mobility by enabling near-instant movement of assets across firms and jurisdictions."1The increased use of digital assets as collateral is recognised by financial market regulators, as well as by industry participants, as an opportunity to enhance efficiency and reduce the risks associated with cross-border collateral exchanges between financial firms and with end-users. The borderless nature of the markets and infrastructure which enables transactions in digital assets also complicates the assessment of legal risk. One critical issue is that of priority, meaning the ability for providers of debt finance to obtain a security interest over a digital asset which ranks ahead of other claimants. This article compares the position in England and Wales with the US under Art 12 of the Uniform Commercial Code.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
