Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Redressing the balance in competition class actions
© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All rights reserved.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Evans v Barclays Bank plc & others [2025] UKSC 48 represents a significant recalibration of the UK’s competition law class action regime. In clarifying the test to be applied by the Competition Appeal Tribunal when determining whether to certify claims on an opt-out basis, the decision will have lasting consequences for proposed class representatives, funders, and defendants.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
