In this article, the authors consider certain issues of principle decided or clarified by the Court of Appeal in the Thames Water restructuring plan: Kington S.À.R.L. & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Holdings Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 475. Namely: the requirement to consider the treatment of “out of the money” creditors when assessing whether the allocation of benefits under a plan is fair, and the meaning of the expression “restructuring surplus” or “benefits preserved or generated by the restructuring”.
9 JUN 2025In this article the authors consider how an English court might view a US-style liability management exercise which: (i) relies on the consent of a majority of creditors within a class to bind a minority within that class; and (ii) treats dissenting creditors less favourably than assenting creditors.
13 JAN 2025