Over the last two decades the scope of the economic torts has been considered in a variety of business contexts and the tort of conspiracy to injure by unlawful means is no exception. Liability may arise where two or more persons combine and take unlawful action with the intention of causing damage to a claimant who incurs the intended damage. Difficult questions about the state of mind of those involved have often arisen. But in the years since the decision in The Racing Partnership Limited v Sports Information Services [2020] EWCA Civ 1300, those participating in competitive deals, where gain could be said to come at the expense of another, may find themselves alleged to have participated in a tortious conspiracy despite believing their activities to be lawful.
This article examines the current state of the law, where difficulties have arisen, and the need for the limits of the tort to be explored further in order to address uncertainties that remain.
The Treasury has announced its intention to amend the Payment Services Regulations 2017 (PSR). As a means of combatting authorised push payment (APP) fraud, banks will be given the power to delay the transferring of funds where they have established that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the payment order has been placed subsequent to fraud or dishonesty. When utilising this discretion, they must inform their customer, who can then decide whether to rescind their instruction. Although the new power may prevent many instances of fraud, it is not without its problems, and this article discusses six sets of issues.
28 JUN 2024