Feature

Non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs): leverage, liquidity and interconnectedness

This article examines the evolving regulatory approach to non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs), focusing on the European Commission’s 2024 consultation on macroprudential tools. Using alternative investment funds (AIFs) as a case study, the article explores the extent to which existing regulatory frameworks mitigate potential systemic risks posed by NBFIs.

Transfer restrictions in the age of synthetic credit risk transfer: time for a re-assessment?

Hedging: where is the dividing line?

Hedging is a risk management practice commonly adopted by financial institutions and corporations to manage their exposure to risks like movements in interest rates, currency fluctuations, or commodity price fluctuations. This article highlights the legal distinction between “internal” and “external” hedging, as discussed in Rhine Shipping DMCC v Vitol SA. ¹ It then considers the implications of this legal distinction and practical steps to mitigate any associated litigation risks.

The expanding nature of undervalue transactions: recent cases and practical issues

Recent case law has raised some interesting points around challenges to transactions at an undervalue, which have application for insolvency practitioners who may wish to bring such cases, and creditors seeking to use this legislation to enforce judgments or otherwise challenge the disposal of assets by a debtor. In this article, the authors consider some legal and practical issues to which the authorities give rise and offer some considerations for parties who may find themselves involved in such litigation.

Navigating the impact of portfolio company distress events under NAV facilities

Net Asset Value (NAV) facilities are a key liquidity tool for private investment funds, allowing borrowing against portfolio company valuations through loan-to-value covenants. This article examines how financial distress events are managed under such facilities via Material Investment Events – provisions that trigger the exclusion or downward adjustment of an investment’s value from the NAV calculation. It discusses various distress triggers, including insolvency events, adverse auditor opinions, accelerated indebtedness, defaults, and adverse judgments, and highlights the critical negotiation of these definitions. The article also explores valuation challenge rights, which allow lenders to contest fund valuations, and outlines the operational consequences for NAV facilities where portfolio company distress events trigger increases in LTV.

Cryptoassets as loan security

In this article Nik Yeo considers when it is possible under English law to create security over cryptoassets, looking specifically at the four forms of security interest: mortgage, charge, pledge and lien, alongside a potential control-based security interest, and the functional security that might be provided by DeFi protocols.

In sickness and in health: a review of transfer provisions in European leveraged loan agreements

Private equity sponsors, with good reason, are very aware of the importance of their portfolio businesses being able to control the types of lenders who hold their debt. They are keen to manage lender relationships throughout their investment period. Equally, it is important for lenders not to be unduly restricted in their ability to trade out of their loans should they need to. This obvious tension in the relationship between the borrower and its lenders has resulted in ever more detailed and restrictive transfer provisions in European leveraged loan agreements. This article considers the details of those provisions.

Understanding co-operation agreements: current boom, fundamental issues and latest trends

In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of Co-operation Agreements in US and European restructurings as a reaction to lenders being caught on the wrong side of a liability management exercise. This article highlights fundamental issues and trends with respect to Co-operation Agreements, discussing practical considerations, recent case developments and the potential further evolution, and use, of Co-operation Agreements in the future.

Scotland’s new statutory pledge: taking security over shares

Before the new regime was introduced, to take fixed security over shares in a Scottish company the shares needed to be transferred to the security holder (or its nominee). This causes a myriad of practical problems. The Moveable Transactions (Scotland) Act 2023, which came into force on 1 April 2025, allows (with a little help from the UK government) a new form of fixed security, the statutory pledge, to be taken over shares in Scottish companies that will side-step the bulk of these issues. This article explores the problems previously encountered in taking security over shares in Scottish companies and the advantages (and a few shortcomings) of the new statutory pledge. The old fixed security by transfer remains competent.

“Red flags” and ostensible authority: reflections on Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse & Ors

The question of when an agent has ostensible authority to bind their principal has been the subject of several important decisions in recent years. That question arose again in Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse International & Ors  [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm) (Mozambique)  in relation to whether the Mozambican finance minister had authority to enter into sovereign guarantees on behalf of the Republic of Mozambique  (the Republic) with various lending banks. This article analyses some of the issues that arose in Mozambique in relation to ostensible authority and considers the “red flags” of financial crime relied upon by the Republic as putting the banks on inquiry that the finance minister did not have authority.