Feature

Market abuse and restitution orders: challenges for FCA policy

This article addresses the potential for the Financial Conduct Authority’s use of its powers to order restitution for market abuse against a listed or publicly traded company/issuer, to undermine the liability regime for such companies to their investors set out elsewhere in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). It suggests that the proportionate issuer liability regime which was adopted, after extensive consultation, between 2006 and 2010, and is now contained in s 90A and Sch 10A FSMA, is a key aspect of UK public market competitiveness and that restitution should not become a substitute means for investors to recover losses for disclosure breaches from the issuer, absent fraud.

Sanctions defences after Celestial Aviation: when does s 44 of SAMLA 2018 help?

In this article Tom Leary considers the scope of sanctions-based defences under s 44 of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 for banks and financial institutions faced with debt claims, following the Court of Appeal’s decision in Celestial Aviation Services Limited v Unicredit Bank GmbH, London Branch  [2024] EWCA Civ 628.

Two continents separated by a common language? Harmonising US and European loans

Loan terms that were once predominantly a feature of US loan agreements have over the last decade been more frequently imported into European loan agreement. It has now become common in the European syndicated term loan B (TLB) marker to include "blended" terms, where English law loan agreements incorporate terms and concepts more typical of US loans. Differences do remain across the two markets, and  we will conduct a comparison exercise at the end of this article to show how key terms vary. 

In addition, the contrasting legal and insolvency backdrop in the US versus European jurisdictions necessarily dictates structural differences in credit support and intercreditor frameworks. Drafting complexities can therefore arise if, for commercial reasons, a deal is documented using US terms for a European group, or vice versa, using European terms for a US-dominant group. Here, parties need to be alive to protections you may need to transplant from one set of market norms to another. 

The potential impact of the new UK Listing Rules on securities litigation

The radical restructuring of the UK listing framework by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has shifted greater risk to investors. This article examines the potential impact of the overhaul of the regime on future claims brought by shareholders under ss 90 and 90A of Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

From London to Berlin: insights on taking security over receivables in Germany

This article explores some of the complexities and key considerations for lenders and legal practitioners when taking security over receivables in Germany. We consider: (i) the types of security that can be taken over receivables and their key features/formalities; (ii) how to navigate contractual restrictions on transfer; (iii) potential pitfalls when taking security over receivables; and (iv) secured creditors’ priority when realising security over receivables in an insolvency.

Lost in the labyrinth: the Court of Appeal in KVB Consultants

The decision of the Court of Appeal in KVB Consultants Ltd & Ors v Jacob Hopkins McKenzie Ltd & Ors  [2024] EWCA Civ 765 has important implications for anyone who deals with, appoints or acts as an appointed representative (AR). It applied a number of principles from existing case law but reached a surprising conclusion regarding how a principal can limit the responsibility it takes for its AR.

Money laundering in the supply chain: the use of “adequate consideration” to “cleanse” criminal property

Section 329 (2)(c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 exempts a person from criminal liability where criminal property is acquired for adequate consideration. Previous authority appeared to suggest that the provision of adequate consideration had the effect of "cleansing" criminal property. Thus, anyone who subsequently dealt with the property would not commit a money laundering offence. 

In Rex (on the application of World Uyghur Congress) and National Crime Agency  [2024] EWCA Civ 715, 26 June 2024  the Court of Appeal rejected this interpretation. In a decision which will have significant implications for businesses and professional advisors, the court held that the “adequate consideration” exemption is no more than a personal exemption. It has no impact on the status of the property as criminal property or recoverable property. It does not therefore operate to cleanse tainted property. 

How to address the “possession or control” issue in the UK Financial Collateral Arrangements

This article examines the legal uncertainties surrounding collateralisation in the UK, focusing on the Financial Collateral Arrangements (No.2) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/3226. It explores the challenges posed by the “provision” of collateral and the “possession or control” test, especially in practical portfolio management and derivatives markets. Through an analysis of key case law, the article identifies inconsistencies and recommends separate definitions for “possession” and “control”. These proposed reforms aim to align legal definitions with modern financial practice, thereby enhancing legal certainty, reducing systemic risk, and supporting the resilience of financial markets.

Contracting out of the default discharge rule

This article considers whether it is possible to contract out of the rule that the discharge of one surety results in the discharge of all co-sureties and whether such a clause in a contract complies with the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, in light of Cynergy Bank Ltd v Dinglis  [2024] EWHC 754 (Comm).

The limitations of limited recourse

This article unpacks the risks for lawyers advising on financing transactions which are, on their face, limited recourse transactions, looking at alternative routes to recourse which funders may have against the operating companies, their directors and shareholders who utilise these financing structures. The underlying security assets are typically some or all of real property, shares, receivables and bank accounts.