Feature
734
Go to page
of
74
Super senior Revolving Credit Facility: a legacy product?
Virtually all businesses need or want a line of credit to provide working capital to support daily operations and growth. Sponsors need to balance this operational need with the importance of moving quickly and execution certainty. As a result market practice has developed Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) Establishment provisions to mitigate this challenge by agreeing up-front mechanics for bringing in a working capital provider post-closing. The legal position is now well established for this approach. However, a commercial tension remains on the super senior RCF product itself so implementation variations and the unitranche/SSRCF structure that had become the norm are being tested.
22 November 2025Sustainable Finance: Newspeak
This article explores one of several issues potentially causing difficulties within the area known as “sustainable finance”. It focuses on the use of language and raises questions around the particular style of phrasing prevalent throughout the emerging taxonomies, sustainability reports, financial products and other materials which comprise the sustainable finance market. After briefly describing examples of these issues, this article advocates returning to language and grammar which is plain and simple.
22 November 2025Challenging the status quo: designated counsel and sponsor blacklists
In this article Michelle Gilmore-Parry explores the recent adoption of sponsor blacklists in European leveraged financings and discusses some key considerations for lenders.
22 November 2025Payback time: when lending agreements are silent on key terms
This article considers a number of important principles relating to the repayment and prepayment of loans and how they are applied when a loan agreement fails expressly to cover them.
22 November 2025An Englishman in New York: English law considerations in New York law credit agreements
English lawyers are sometimes required to consider how to weave points of English law and practice into New York law governed credit agreements to cater for the inclusion of an English credit party in what would otherwise be a US centric transaction. In this article the author looks at the several broad areas to consider when undertaking such an exercise, some of which may have material ramifications if not adequately addressed.
22 November 2025Losing privilege for iniquity short of fraud: implications of recent s 423 cases
Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 allows courts to unwind transactions entered into to prejudice creditors without requiring proof of dishonesty or fraud. Recent case law has nevertheless treated such claims as inherently alleging “disreputable” conduct, with significant implications for privilege and pleading requirements. This article examines the iniquity exception to privilege in s 423 claims, with particular focus on the November 2024 decision in Invest Bank v El-Husseini [2024] EWHC 2976. That decision suggests that establishing a prima facie case of an undervalue transaction entered into for the statutory purpose engages stricter pleading rules and displaces privilege. However, uncertainty remains about the boundaries of this presumption of inherent iniquity and its practical implications for privilege loss across s 423 cases.
22 November 2025Supply chain finance in the EU: Part 1 – lessons from recent failures and the case for a targeted SCF Regulation?
Supply chain finance (SCF) is vital for EU working capital but operates within a fragmented and opaque regulatory framework. Recent high-profile failures in or otherwise affecting the SCF market have exposed critical structure weaknesses, including inconsistent private-law rules, insufficient transparency beyond securitisation and uneven operational safeguards. These issues obscure leverage, create liquidity risks and complicate cross-border enforceability, significantly impeding the Single Market.
This article advocates for a proportionate, targeted EU SCF Regulation. It proposes a framework encompassing harmonised definitions, calibrated data and disclosure standards via light-touch repositories and enhanced private-law certainty, including a uniform conflicts-of-law rule and an interoperable e-notice mechanism. These reforms would substantially improve legal certainty, transparency and market stability, ultimately lowering funding costs, increasing small and medium-sized enterprises access to finance and advancing the EU’s Savings and Investments Union objectives.
Misrepresentation and the constructive trust: a hunt for clarity
This article addresses the debate which has arisen from Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s much cited dictum that equity imposes a constructive trust on a fraudulent recipient whenever property is obtained by fraud. It explores the rationale for the imposition of a constructive trust in the context of the underlying legal principles and considers how those principles have been approached in the key authorities. In an effort to identify a coherent rationalisation of the authorities, it then focuses on the decision in Halley v Law Society and addresses whether that decision can be reconciled with other authority, particularly the recent Supreme Court decision in Philipp v Barclays Bank UK plc .
25 October 2025Securities lending in the age of PISCES
The UK’s capital markets are eagerly awaiting the implementation of a new private company secondary trading platform following the adoption of the final rules for the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES) in June 2025. In the next six months, the London Stock Exchange and potentially other operators are expected to have PISCES platforms up and running, thereby marking the debut of the first regulated market for the intermittent secondary trading of private company shares.1 The timing seems auspicious: public listings in the UK and Europe have fallen to historic lows as private companies increasingly pursue alternative routes to liquidity.2 As private markets mature and investor demand grows, the PISCES framework may unlock opportunities for private company share lending, although such arrangements raise significant questions around valuation, settlement, transfer restrictions and alignment with existing share lending market practices.
25 October 2025Uniform prospectus liability rules for Europe now!
The harmonisation of the rules on prospectus liability should be put on the agenda of the Savings and Investment Union (SIU) as a matter of urgency. The International Working Group on Harmonisation of Prospectus Liability in Europe (IWGHPLE), a private group of academics and practitioners from different EU member states and beyond (led by the authors of this article), has recently drafted a concrete blueprint for uniform European prospectus liability rules. The blueprint could serve as a model for the European legislator in its efforts to overcome the current fragmentation of the EU’s legal framework. The blueprint covers all aspects pertaining to prospectus liability.
25 October 2025
Go to page
of
74
