Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Feature

839
Go to page of 84 Next Pagination

The impact of jet fuel volatility on aviation finance

In this article the authors consider the impact of jet fuel volatility (both price increases and supply shortages) on airline profitability and the consequent impact on aviation finance.
26 July 2026

Enforcement of security over digital assets: the importance of pre-emptive structural design

As digital assets become central collateral in international banking, traditional lex situs  rules are increasingly inadequate for decentralised ledger systems. The absence of a fixed legal location creates significant jurisdictional uncertainty
in determining proprietary rights and enforcement.
This article examines the evolving legal framework for enforcing security over digital assets, shifting the focus from location-based analysis to a functional nexus grounded in technical and commercial realities. Drawing on English case law and the 2023 UNIDROIT Principles, it proposes a structured approach to cross-border enforcement risk.
It argues that effective enforcement depends not solely on legal doctrine but on aligning proprietary rights with mechanisms of technical control, including multi-signature custody structures. Only this integration allows legal remedies to translate into actual control over digital assets in a decentralised financial environment.
26 July 2026

Loan-linked hedging for the buy side – Part 1 (of 10): an introduction

Across ten articles, the focus is a topic notorious for its opacity: OTC derivatives, hedging floating benchmark risk for corporate borrowers. We cover significant ground, arming readers, step by step, with the knowledge to visualise best practice documentation between a hedging bank (HedgeBK) and hedging company (HedgeCO) and negotiate terms critical for safe, effective and resilient protection.
After starting with what can go wrong, key concepts are addressed: from macro issues (the starting position of standardised ISDA-based documentation; selection of an appropriate trading structure; and the need to understand - in detail - the hedged risk or "underlying"); to micro concerns (addressing what I call "Contractual Basis Risk"; considering the sometimes dangerously unfettered power of HedgeBK to take action; and questioning the involvement of HedgeCO's affiliates).
The series concludes by planning how to approach documentation for "the perfect hedge" and walks through important Schedule provisions. A list of defined terms and expressions for the series is included at the end of this introduction.
26 July 2026

The state of third-party litigation funding: what companies facing funded claims need to know – Part I: the UK and EU

Third-party litigation funding (TPLF) is increasingly commonplace in complex cases. Heavily funded cases expose businesses to heightened risk and more expansive, protracted litigation, all while stirring up myriad legal and ethical minefields. 2026 is a pivotal year for TPLF, with landmark legislative proposals, judicial decisions, and regulatory developments across the US, UK and EU. Companies are well advised to stay alert as its use (and the attendant risks) continue to evolve.This two-part series will summarise the current TPLF landscape in these three jurisdictions and highlight five notable developments in each. This article, Part I, will provide an overview of today’s funding model and a market snapshot, before focusing on the dynamics in the UK and the EU. Part II, to be published in the next edition of this journal, will cover the landscape in the US, as well as suggesting the key takeaways from Parts I and II taken together.
26 July 2026

German share pledges in insolvency: disposal authority, enforcement design and security agent risk

In cross-border financings involving German collateral, enforcement is often approached as a matter of contractual control under intercreditor arrangements and security agent instructions. In German insolvency scenarios involving pledged shares and other governance-sensitive rights, that approach may be incomplete. The prior legal question is whether disposal and enforcement authority rests with the insolvency estate or remains with the secured creditor.
This article examines the resulting execution risk, the limits of insolvency-led sales assumptions, and the consequences for lenders, security agents and restructuring advisers. It argues that, where disposals authority is uncertain, enforcement design must be aligned with the statutory mechanics of the collateral jurisdiction and that a public auction may, in some cases, provide a faster, more transparent and more legally defensible route to realisation.
26 July 2026

Bridging public regulations and private rights in the US GENIUS Act and Hong Kong’s Stablecoins Ordinance – Part 2: trusts and bankruptcy

This Part 2 focuses on the second part of investor protection (the trustee structure) and stablecoin holder safeguards on issuer insolvency.
26 July 2026

Entirely unco-operative, Part 2: if an LME becomes a Restructuring Plan will anti-co-ops limit the Plan’s likelihood of approval or fracture the class?

This article is the second part of ‘Entire agreement clauses: entirely unco-operative to void co-ops? Part 1’ published in June’s edition of JIBFL (2026) 6 JIBFL 398. It looks at whether co-operation agreement lenders get less than they hoped for if a liability management exercise morphs into a formal restructuring plan before an English court. Will the putative anti-pro rata sharing implied by a co-operation agreement (to the extent it is detrimental to non-participating creditors) doom the approval of the plan to failure for impinging on the pari passu  principle? Will the borrower’s use of anti-cooperation agreement provisions help or hurt the chances of plan confirmation or result in fracturing a creditor class where certain creditors have been disenfranchised by such provisions?
29 June 2026

Dodgy financial reporting or financial covenant breach

In this article we consider how preservation of an agreed approach to financial monitoring and calculations for leveraged finance loans in the European mid-market is fundamental to maintain suitable protections for private credit lenders. Discrepancies in figures can raise red flags as to whether the financial reporting is simply inconsistent or whether the sponsor is attempting to hide a financial covenant breach. We discuss options available to lenders to clarify figures and request additional information.
29 June 2026

Governance-by-design for private markets: from platforms to capital infrastructure

Part II of the two-part series ‘Governance-by-Design for Private Markets’ advances governance-by-design from a diagnostic framework to an operational model. As long-term investors such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds become more sophisticated and evolve from product takers into platform architects, governance becomes increasingly important. This article argues that governance-by-design becomes an operational necessity when private markets platforms begin to function less as traditional asset managers and more as core components of global capital infrastructure.
29 June 2026

Prediction markets in the UK: betting the house or hedging your bets?

Prediction markets are trading platforms on which participants trade event contracts whose value depends on whether specified future events occur. In the US, these markets are currently experiencing a period of rapid growth, and at the same time have emerged as one of the most contested areas at the intersection of financial regulation and gambling law. In the UK, their regulatory characterisation turns on whether the contract references a “financial” or a non-financial outcome.
29 June 2026
Go to page of 84 Next Pagination