Feature
760
Go to page
of
76
Liquidity mismatch in UCITS schemes after Woodford
This article examines the problem of “liquidity mismatch” within certain categories of retail funds and assesses whether recent new rules and proposals from UK regulators adequately address that issue.
13 June 2024Showing no recourse: in defence of supply chain finance post-Greensill
This article emerged in response to the onslaught of publicity generated by the insolvency of Greensill. For many this has been their first true introduction to supply chain finance and the coverage has not been very positive. Every few years the collapse of an industry stalwart or promising up-and-comer is held up as a cautionary tale, emblematic of underlying weaknesses or failings of its sector. However, it would be unfortunate to let Greensill’s legacy be the tarring of supply chain finance in general when it plays such an important role in facilitating global trade.
13 June 2024Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk: how should Islamic financial law apply in multi-jurisdictional litigious disputes?
Holders of Islamic financial instruments (often creditors) carry well-justified expectations that offerors and issuers (often borrowers) will observe the highest levels of integrity, transparency and proper (non-prevaricatory) conduct. The discussion surrounding the legal ramifications and impact on the Islamic financial services industry of Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk Ltd and others [2017] EWHC 2928 (Comm) (17 November 2017) (Dana Gas PJSC) is therefore still incomplete. The High Court’s decision to rule the Purchase Undertaking valid and enforceable, regardless of whether the Mudarabah Agreement governing the Sukuk had been Shariah complaint or not, barely scratched the surface. Indeed, if anything, what has come out of the High court in Dana Gas PJSC is that not much has been said in a manner which would have addressed fundamental questions pertaining to Sukuk in a norm-setting way.
13 June 2024LIBOR transition: ISDA Protocol first mover disadvantage and other international perspectives
In this article, the authors consider some of the key international developments in Q4 2020 relating to LIBOR transition. They conclude that parties should exercise significant caution before signing up to the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol.
13 June 2024How to get recognised: cross-border recognition of insolvency and restructuring proceedings post-Brexit
This article summarises the post-Brexit position regarding inbound and outbound recognition of insolvency and restructuring proceedings between the UK and the EU.
13 June 2024Lenders’ duties in the “twilight zone”, after default but before appointment or enforcement
In this article we consider what duties are owed by a lender in the period after default by the borrower, but before any appointment or other enforcement steps are taken. We do so in the context of the question of what duties are owed in relation to restructuring services or actions of the lender having regard, in particular to the recent decision and observations of the Court of Appeal in Morley Estates v Royal Bank of Scotland [2021] EWCA Civ 338. We start by considering the question of why there is a need for protection and then seek to identify the case in favour of lenders’ duties being owed in the context of the decision made in Morley Estates v RBS at first instance and in the Court of Appeal.
13 June 2024LIBOR transition and managing competition law risk
In this article Professor Suzanne Rab responds to the Financial Market Law Commission’s clarion call to consider key competition issues arising from a move to Risk Free Rates (RFR) or similar. She identifies challenges for the competition law regulation of banking benchmarking practices that need to be addressed.
13 June 2024Quincecare and the question of government liability where there has been Bounce Back Loan fraud
Two recent circuit commercial court decisions have considered the scope of a Payment Service Provider’s duty of care to its customer when executing payment instructions (Quincecare duty) in the contexts of identity fraud: Hamblin v World First Limited [2020] EWHC 2383 (Comm) and authorised push payment fraud: Philipp v Barclays Bank UK Plc [2021] EWHC 10 (Comm). This article speculates in the light of these two decisions whether, where scheme funds lent under the Coronavirus Bounce Back Loan Scheme have been misapplied, the British Business Bank could escape liability under the Scheme guarantee on the grounds that the lender has breached its Quincecare duty.
13 June 2024Parent companies’ liability in tort for the acts of their subsidiaries
In this article the authors consider a parent bank’s liability for the torts of its subsidiary in light of the Supreme Court decision in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell [2021] UKSC 3.
13 June 2024Financial collateral and Brexit: a comparative perspective
The EU directive on financial collateral (EU Directive 2002/47/EC) (Directive), as implemented in the UK remains (with amendments) on the statute book and has not been directly impacted in any meaningful sense by Brexit. However, given the latitude inherent in the Directive, a marginally fractured legislative landscape has resulted across the member states.
13 June 2024
Go to page
of
76
