Feature

Whilst 2020 will be remembered for less positive reasons, restructuring professionals may remember it for the creation of: (i) the “Restructuring Plan” under the UK’s Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA 2020); (ii) the Dutch scheme under Wet homologatie onderhands akkoord (Dutch Scheme); and (iii) the German scheme under the StaRUG (German Scheme). Each bears similarities with the tried and tested English scheme of arrangement but has adopted certain features from the US Chapter 11 process. This article covers some of the important differences between each process that practitioners should be aware of.

This article considers the new provisions in the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA) on so-called ipso facto clauses and how those provisions interact with cross-border contracts.

A recent High Court decision in a knowing receipt claim against a Saudi Arabian bank has considered the vexed issue of whether a beneficiary must have a continuing equitable interest enduring upon receipt of the property by the recipient to establish a knowing receipt claim. In a detailed and well-reasoned judgment Mr Justice Fancourt answered that question in the affirmative.

The scope for misalignment between the payments and the data protection regimes in Europe and the UK gives rise to a number of challenges for banks and fintechs. This issue is particularly evident in relation to the potentially inconsistent requirements for individual consent.

Dov Ohrenstein reviews how the courts approach applications to amend claims after the end of relevant limitation periods.

The question of how UK-based lenders can continue to make funds available to European borrowers remains a key one for market participants. In this article, the authors explore some of the key practical challenges and questions now facing UK-based lenders.

Over the past twelve months, governments have implemented various measures that have created uncertainty around the meaning of the term “business day”. This is further complicated by the historic English law approach, which emphasises the predeterminable nature of a “business day” and discourages investigation into the particular facts of the case. This stands in tension with definitions (including the LMA standard definition) which focus upon banks actually being open for business on a given day. This article considers how, in these circumstances, parties may be able to increase certainty in relation to the way that time is calculated under finance agreements.

Bail-in is at the heart of the post-crisis reform in dealing with failing banks. But in the euro area bail-in must pass a public interest test before it can be used, and bail-in has become the exception not the norm. The norm remains “winding up of the entity under normal insolvency proceedings”. The public interest test should be reversed. The use of bail-in to achieve orderly liquidation under a solvent wind-down strategy should serve as the presumptive path for handling banks that are deemed to be “failing or likely to fail”. Together with the backstop from the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) for the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), the reversal of the public interest test will open the door to the creation of the Single Deposit Guarantee Scheme (SDGS) and to the completion of Banking Union.

In this article the authors consider recent developments in relation to class composition in creditors’ schemes. With reference in particular to Re Codere Finance 2 (UK) Limited [2020] EWHC 2441 (Ch), they consider whether benefits conferred “outside” the scheme in lock-up agreements may fracture a class of creditors, and the consequences for companies seeking to restructure debt. They also consider whether the recent introduction of Pt 26A restructuring plans may change the focus of class composition analysis going forward.

The FCA, after prompting by Parliament, is pressing ahead with its proposals for a new consumer duty of care like approach in financial services, albeit in a way that does not in fact impose a duty of care. Instead, changes to the existing Principles of Business are being suggested, which will sit at the head of a pyramid of measures designed to bring about change. This article considers the likelihood that change will in fact be achieved.