Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Feature

734
Go to page of 74 Next Pagination

Financial sanctions and the case for digital central bank money

Central banks around the world have been contemplating the creation of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)1 for the best part of the last five years, with some of them already experimenting, at the time of writing, with pilot schemes. This article explores to what extent the armed conflict that recently erupted in Europe’s periphery strengthens, as some have argued, the case for their issuance so as to better enforce financial sanctions imposed on deviant state actors or, instead, creates risks of currency retaliation as well as jeopardising the credibility of public money and its issuers.

20 March 2024

Extending the cloak: individual immunity for foreign officials

In this article, Daniel Benedyk considers the application of state immunity to individuals acting on behalf of states and “separate entities”. This issue was not addressed in the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA), but has since been developed in case law. In particular, it has been considered in two significant decisions of the Commercial Court in the last year.

20 March 2024

Licence to Quill: legal services licences following the recent wave of Russian sanctions

In the wake of Russia’s unlawful invasion of Ukraine, public perception, triggered – and at times encouraged – by the media and MPs, appears to support a blanket ban on representing persons and entities designated (DPs) under the UK’s new sanctions framework, or even non-designated persons allied to Vladimir Putin or his regime. As a result, lawyers have quickly become stuck between, on the one hand, a purported moral obligation and internal-firm practice based on commercial considerations ostensibly consistent with foreign policy and, on the other, their duty to preserve due process. In this article, Alex Haines delineates between what is and is not permitted.

20 March 2024

The classification of interest rate swaps as contingent liability cases

In this article, Katherine Ratcliffe summarises Mr Justice Jacobs’ decision in CJ and LK Perks v NatWest Markets [2022] EWHC 726 (Comm) as to when the limitation period for an interest rate swap began and explains why Mr Justice Jacobs’ conclusions are correct.

20 March 2024

Russian sovereign debt default: a disputes perspective

Russia’s default on its foreign currency sovereign bonds is unprecedented and likely to lead to bondholder litigation as well as derivatives disputes. This article highlights the reasons for Russia’s default and explores the scope of potential bondholder litigation, together with some of the obstacles which bondholders may face in bringing claims against Russia. The article then considers the ripple effect on the derivatives market, where it is possible that investors in products linked to Russian debt may seek to recover losses by bringing mis-selling claims.

20 March 2024

ESG Update: Green/sustainable finance in the real estate finance market

In this update Oriol Espar and César Herrero examine recent trends in real estate financing from a green/sustainability perspective and offer some guidance on dealing with green/sustainability-related wording, especially as regards green real estate finance transactions.

20 March 2024

Tiptoe through the tulips: fiduciary and common law duties of care in cryptocurrency

Tulip Trading Limited v Bitcoin Association for BSV and ors [2022] EWHC 667 (Ch) involved an unusual claim by an alleged owner of Bitcoin seeking to force core developers of the Bitcoin code to take reasonable steps to “patch” that code to circumvent the fact that the claimant no longer controlled the relevant private key. This was analysed by the court on traditional principles of fiduciary duties and common law duties of care, but more broadly the claims can be seen to challenge the decentralized nature of the Bitcoin blockchain and the importance of private keys to the certainty and security of that blockchain.

20 March 2024

Bragging rights: termination clauses and implied duties of good faith

In this article, the authors consider the circumstances in which termination clauses in a commercial contract might be subject to a so-called Braganza duty of good faith and the practical issues that might follow from this.

20 March 2024

The endgame: issues in enforcement against cryptoassets

This article considers the possibility of recovering cryptoassets without the authorisation of the private key.

20 March 2024

Cryptoassets, consumers and foreign arbitration

This article considers Soleymani v Nifty Gateway LLC [2022] EWHC 773 (Comm) (Soleymani) in which the High Court held it had no jurisdiction and granted a stay under s 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) of proceedings brought by an English consumer primarily to enforce his rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015).

20 March 2024
Go to page of 74 Next Pagination