In this article, Daniel Benedyk considers the application of state immunity to individuals acting on behalf of states and “separate entities”. This issue was not addressed in the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA), but has since been developed in case law. In particular, it has been considered in two significant decisions of the Commercial Court in the last year.
20 March 2024Central banks around the world have been contemplating the creation of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)1 for the best part of the last five years, with some of them already experimenting, at the time of writing, with pilot schemes. This article explores to what extent the armed conflict that recently erupted in Europe’s periphery strengthens, as some have argued, the case for their issuance so as to better enforce financial sanctions imposed on deviant state actors or, instead, creates risks of currency retaliation as well as jeopardising the credibility of public money and its issuers.
20 March 2024In this article, the authors consider the circumstances in which termination clauses in a commercial contract might be subject to a so-called Braganza duty of good faith and the practical issues that might follow from this.
20 March 2024This article considers the possibility of recovering cryptoassets without the authorisation of the private key.
20 March 2024Tulip Trading Limited v Bitcoin Association for BSV and ors [2022] EWHC 667 (Ch) involved an unusual claim by an alleged owner of Bitcoin seeking to force core developers of the Bitcoin code to take reasonable steps to “patch” that code to circumvent the fact that the claimant no longer controlled the relevant private key. This was analysed by the court on traditional principles of fiduciary duties and common law duties of care, but more broadly the claims can be seen to challenge the decentralized nature of the Bitcoin blockchain and the importance of private keys to the certainty and security of that blockchain.
20 March 2024Will the proceeds of the sale of an asset, excluded from the scope of a floating charge, be captured by that charge when sold by an insolvency practitioner? In this article the authors consider the default position under general law in relation to this issue and what parties should do to ensure their intentions are appropriately reflected when formulating security packages.
20 March 2024This article considers Soleymani v Nifty Gateway LLC [2022] EWHC 773 (Comm) (Soleymani) in which the High Court held it had no jurisdiction and granted a stay under s 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) of proceedings brought by an English consumer primarily to enforce his rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015).
20 March 2024Unlike an English private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act 2006, an English limited partnership (LP) is not a legal entity. In practice, this can create confusion and risk when LPs create and register security. Stephan Smoktunowicz examines some of the key considerations when taking security from LPs including the grey areas which surround registration and how to approach them more safely.
20 March 2024A key weapon in the lender’s arsenal is the default provisions contained in a loan agreement and the actions that the lender may take upon the occurrence of an event of default. In Lombard North Central plc v European Skyjets Limited [2022] EWHC 728 (QB), Mr Justice Foxton considered whether certain events of default had occurred and whether Lombard had validly terminated the loan agreement so as to enable it to enforce its security, namely Skyjets’ aircraft. The judge’s legal analysis provides a useful recap of the legal principles. This article focusses on the doctrine of waiver by election and some practical considerations for lenders in a default scenario.
20 March 2024In this article Nora Beausang considers recent case law relating to the interpretation of “consumer” for the purposes of special jurisdictional rules (Recast Brussels Regulation and its predecessors), considers whether this interpretation has wider application to other regulatory protections applying to consumers and argues for the limitation of this more expansive interpretation.
20 March 2024