Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Feature

773
Go to page of 78 Next Pagination

Enforcing judgments against pension assets: a developing jurisdiction

In Blight v Brewster [2012] EWHC 165 (Ch) the court implemented an innovative procedure enabling a judgment creditor to enforce against the debtor’s pension fund. Blight has been followed in a trio of reported decisions handed down in 2022, which examined particular aspects of the procedure and its application in specific circumstances, further establishing the jurisdiction and helping to delimit its boundaries.

19 March 2024

The doctrine of universal succession in English law and its impact on the transfer of finance arrangements

In this article the authors consider the relationship between English law and the doctrine of universal succession and the likelihood of controversial creditor issues where finance arrangements are transferred.

19 March 2024

Retail Central Bank Digital Currencies: core assumptions and legal implications

This article explores two of the main assumptions underlying the public reflections of central banks on the topic of retail CBDCs, namely that these would qualify as money and would represent a claim on the balance sheet of their issuing central bank. The article also draws attention to the importance of understanding the impact on retail CBDCs of the legal analysis of different CBDC models.

19 March 2024

Swaps litigation: the continuing search for certainty

Banks who enter into swaps with public sector entities might reasonably have hoped that during the three decades since Hazell v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [1992] 2 AC 1 (in which the House of Lords ruled that the local authority’s interest-rate swaps were speculative and ultra vires) most of the associated legal problems would have been resolved. Two recent cases in the Commercial Court involving Italian authorities show that quite a lot remains to be argued about. These are Deutsche Bank AG London v Comune di Busto Arsizio [2021] EWHC 2706 (Comm) (Busto) and Banca Intesa Sanpaolo SPA & Anor v Comune Di Venezia [2022] EWHC 2586 (Comm) (Venezia). In this article Andrew Fulton KC highlights the continuing problems so far as the enforceability of a disputed swap is concerned.

19 March 2024

There are known unknowns: how strict is civil liability for breaches of sanctions?

In this article Tom Leary explains how the introduction of sub-s 146(1A) of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 – the introduction of a strict liability regime for breaches of the UK sanctions regime – has created uncertainty that needs to be addressed quickly by Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation.

19 March 2024

The missing piece of the puzzle: the adoption of the UNIDROIT Model Law on Factoring

The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) has just adopted the UNIDROIT Model Law on Factoring after three years of negotiations. The UNIDROIT Model Law is the newest addition to the international legislative framework for receivables finance, building upon earlier important instruments developed by both UNIDROIT and UNCITRAL. The UNIDROIT Model Law is well positioned to improve access to credit for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises involved in global supply chains, in the face of increasingly difficult international economic headwinds.

19 March 2024

Remedies for victims of crypto fraud

In this article, Gretel Scott discusses the possible remedies and methods of enforcement for victims of crypto fraud.

19 March 2024

Appropriation of financial collateral under English law security financial collateral arrangements

For nearly 20 years English law has permitted mortgagees and chargees of financial collateral to exercise a self-help remedy of appropriating charged collateral as a means of enforcing their security. The requirements include agreeing on the valuation of the collateral and conducting the valuation in a commercially reasonable manner. Since the implementing legislation is far wider than required by European law, the effectiveness of the remedy can be undermined by disputes as to what is commercially reasonable in particular factual contexts.

19 March 2024

TARGET 2 – TARGET 2 Securities Consolidation: major change to payment standards

Readers may have seen reference in the media to the European Central Bank (ECB’s) T2-T2S Consolidation project from which it may have appeared to be simply a merging of two existing systems on the same technical platform currently being used by TARGET 2 Securities (T2S). However, it is far more wide-ranging and complex than may first appear and this article aims to put it in context of other developments both within and outside the euro area. This article is based on the latest information available at the time of writing but some of the content may be slightly out of date by the time it is published. However, after completion of drafting a senior ECB official stated that the possibility of a further delay beyond 20 March is considered to be extremely low.

19 March 2024

Principal and main purpose tests in tax treaties: a UK tribunal approach

The recent decision in Burlington Loan Management DAC v HMRC shows the difficulty in determining when parties have a main purpose of obtaining the benefit of a double tax treaty and indeed, which parties’ purposes are relevant. Despite the fact that this case was determined on the basis of UK tax case law, it is likely that an international fiscal meaning of “principal purpose” will develop over time. The UK tribunal decision shows the complexity of assessing whose purposes are relevant and what, on the basis of the evidence, those purposes actually were. This raises important considerations for taxpayers determining whether treaty benefits are available.

19 March 2024
Go to page of 78 Next Pagination