Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Feature

760
Go to page of 76 Next Pagination

Liquidity covenants to the fore

With interest rates remaining at record levels and businesses still struggling with increased costs and the fall-out from the cost-of-living crisis, many businesses have been unable to meet leverage maintenance covenant requirements in their deals. As a quid-pro-quo for covenant relief, lenders often seek to impose a minimum liquidity covenant to ensure the business remains operationally solvent during the covenant relief period. This article explores what a liquidity covenant is and the issues facing sponsors and lenders in negotiating them.

18 March 2024

Shared appreciation mortgages: how far can the “unfair relationships” regime stretch?

A trial of alleged mis-selling of shared appreciation mortgages (SAMs) by Bank of Scotland plc (BoS) is listed for early 2024. In this article Benjamin Pilling KC and Ruth Bala of 4 Pump Court review the issues in the case. Does the “excessive” finance charge generate an “unfair relationship”? Will the court be willing to use the “unfair relationship” provisions to rewrite a mortgage, where there was full disclosure upon inception of the level of the finance charge (c.f. PPI, where the high level of commission was undisclosed)? The authors also consider limitation.

18 March 2024

New challenges for tackling Authorised Push Payment fraud

The Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) has recently announced significant changes to the mandatory reimbursement regime for Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud that will be implemented during 2024. The scheme is likely to create difficulties for financial institutions preparing for the far-reaching changes. This article summarises the reforms, explores the challenges and provides suggestions for preparing for the new measures.

18 March 2024

Risk retention in securitisations: if not the original lender, who else?

It is almost 15 years since the EU’s risk retention (skin-in-the-game) rules were developed in response to concerns that interests of investors in securitisations and their originators were insufficiently aligned. In that time, the market has developed a number of solutions to adhere to the rules in situations where there may no longer be a substantial entity that was involved in the creation of the underlying exposures to perform the risk retention function.

18 March 2024

An assessment of the reliability requirement in the Electronic Trade Documents Act

On 20 September 2023 the Electronic Trade Documents Act (ETDA) came into force. Formerly, in English law, document possession usually required physical possession. Now, the ETDA allows for “electronic trade documents” to be treated as equivalent to traditional “paper trade documents”, if they meet certain “gateway” criteria underpinned by a “reliable system”. In this article, we consider how the English courts are likely to approach interpretating this reliability requirement. Would any flaw in the system, no matter how short-lived and abnormal, render it unreliable? Or would a more detailed systemic analysis be needed? If so, what would that look like?

18 March 2024

The need for a modernised response to financial product regulation

In this article, the authors consider recent federal court decisions that have addressed how two evolving financial products and markets – namely syndicated loans and crypto tokens – should be classified in the US regulatory system. They then highlight the need for policy-oriented reforms to address the current uncertainty.

18 March 2024

“Trust, not distrust”: can Quincecare apply to cryptocurrency transactions on exchanges?

The duty in Quincecare can prove a difficult principle to apply in practice. In the current age of cryptocurrency fraud and the open question of the scope of an exchange’s liability, is now an appropriate time to extend duties found in banking law to the activities of an exchange, or is that taking matters too far?

18 March 2024

What is in a name? The regulators seek to have the final word on the meaning of trading venue under MiFID

For the EU’s and UK’s securities and markets regulators nothing is in the name nor in the technology used when it comes to the need for a trading venue licence. Yet, noting some uncertainty around the application of key concepts to certain facilities, each regulator has sought to provide clarity for their respective markets via recently published guidance.

18 March 2024

The implications of the novel “Audit Duty” on professional service firms: Part 1: Rihan v Ernst & Young

In Part 1 of this two-part article, barrister and Chartered Banker Jacob J Meagher analyses the legal basis of the novel “Audit Duty” using Rihan v Ernst & Young [2020] EWHC 901 (QB) as a case study. In Part 2 he discusses the uncertainties related to the scope and application of the “Audit Duty”, in particular to professional service firms more widely.

18 March 2024

The rise of “hybrids” in the ever-converging PIK and Preferred Equity landscape

In this article the authors consider the key structural, economic and documentary differences between Holdco payment in kind and preferred equity shares and consider recent demand for new hybrid instruments.

18 March 2024
Go to page of 76 Next Pagination