Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Feature

813
Go to page of 82 Next Pagination

Sanctions clauses in documentary credit transactions: a cautionary tale

In the current geopolitical climate, sanctions are increasingly used as a foreign policy tool and can have significant implications for contractual obligations in international trade. In Kuvera Resources Pte Ltd v JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [2023] SGCA 28, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that a confirming bank could not deny payment to the beneficiary of two letters of credit (LCs) on the ground that its confirmations of the LCs included a contractual clause (Sanctions Clause) extinguishing the confirming bank’s liability as the underlying commercial transaction was allegedly caught by the sanctions laws of the US.

18 March 2024

LMA €STR fallbacks to EURIBOR: use in corporate lending transactions

In December 2023, the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (Euro WG)11 issued their final, closing statement122 having agreed that their current mandate had been completed. 2Does this mean that work in relation to the use of risk-free reference rates based on 22STR 2in the context of euro has ended? The short answer is “not necessarily”: whilst the tools2 to implement use of such rates exist, some elements of the financial markets, such as the corporate lending market, have been slow to change practice. In this article we take stock 2of the potential use of such 22STR-related tools in the corporate lending markets.2

18 March 2024

Byers v Saudi National Bank: bona fide purchase, knowing receipt and crypto litigation

In this article Nik Yeo looks at how the Supreme Court’s decision in Byers has clarified important differences between the bona fide purchase defence to an equitable proprietary claim and the distinct personal claim for knowing receipt, particularly relevant in litigation against recipients of cryptoassets.

18 March 2024

The impact of the Electronic Trade Documents Act 2023 on bank practice in trade finance

In this article the author considers the extent to which the innovations introduced by the Electronic Trade Documents Act 2023 may impact on practices in the trade finance arena.

18 March 2024

The key to harnessing the ownership power of NFTs: the need for standardised decentralisation protocols

NFT technology first raised interest because it offered potential to restore full ownership to digital property, which has been restricted in the centralised paradigm since the birth of the internet. However, in the current highly fragmented NFT ecosystem, we need robust standardised protocol systems that guarantee full decentralisation of the token and the underlying asset to consistently deliver on the original NFT promise of full ownership and control. Most NFT projects fail to do this – the underlying asset is not sufficiently decentralised and thus remains vulnerable to manipulation by the centralised issuer, which has damaged application, interoperability, and general consumer interest. In the dot-com era, establishing the PCI DSS security protocol to hold payment providers such as PayPal to high standards of consumer protection revived trust in online commerce that was originally rampant with fraud. Similarly, a flagship decentralisation protocol that requires NFTs to ensure that full ownership and control of the underlying asset passes with a sale will lower information costs for the consumer and increase the opportunity to scale applications of NFTs to high impact use cases beyond cartoon apes.

18 March 2024

“Packing” a punch to litigation funders?

In this article Charlotte Eborall considers the outcome and implications for funders in the recent Supreme Court decision of PACCAR and ors v Competition Appeal Tribunal and Ors [2023] UKSC 28.

18 March 2024

Boilerplate terms restricting freedoms in composite transactions: some traps for the unwary

Entire agreement and no oral modification clauses are designed to promote contractual certainty. But far from guaranteeing that result, their inclusion in transactions implemented by multiple contractual documents can increase the risk of injustice by restricting the availability and operation of rectification and estoppel, even where the contractual documentation does not accord with the parties’ mutual dealings. This article explores how those risks arise so that drafters may seek to mitigate them.

18 March 2024

Private credit continuation funds: a developing frontier for secondary transactions?

In this article, the authors consider the use of continuation funds in private credit by comparing and contrasting their adoption with increasingly popular private equity continuation fund transactions.

18 March 2024

Third party rights and the LMA suite of Debt Documents

The author considers a number of third party rights and protections conferred by Loan Documents with importance in the market, including “Increased Costs” rights and indemnities granted to Receivers, Delegates and others. While “Increased Costs” rights simply give parties to the Debt Documents a right to claim losses suffered by others and are not actionable by third parties, indemnities are. Indemnities are unaffected by the “overriding” clause in Loan Market Association (LMA)-style Intercreditor Agreements. This is commercially important for lenders, security agents and receivers alike.

18 March 2024

The Cambridge Regulatory Genome Project: a must in a world of regulation technologies

This article introduces the Regulatory Genome Project (RGP) at the University of Cambridge, a pioneer research project aiming to create an information structure facilitating the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning within the context of financial regulations. This structure, when adopted, will pave the way for further enhancements to applications in Regulatory Technology (RegTech), Supervisory Technology (SupTech) and the adoption of machine-readable rulebooks; all with tangible benefits to the entire financial system.

18 March 2024
Go to page of 82 Next Pagination