Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Is “name and shame” here to stay? Court dismisses challenge to FCA’s decision to publicly name
© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All rights reserved.
In this In Practice article the authors consider R (CIT (an anonymised company)) v Financial Conduct Authority (No.1) [2025] EWHC 2614 (Admin), and R (on the application of Claims Protection Agency Ltd) v Financial Conduct Authority (No. 2) [2025] EWHC 2615 (Admin) in which the High Court upheld the Financial Conduct Authority’s decision to name a regulated firm as the subject of an investigation.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
