Our authors are experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics experts from a range of related disciplines.

Tony Katz

Partner

Tony Katz is a partner at DLA Piper in London. Email: tony.katz@dlapiper.com


Articles by author

The proposed reforms to the financial promotions regime for consumer credit: a move to an outcomes-based approach

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has proposed reforms to the financial promotions regime for consumer credit in its recent consultation plaper CP26/15. while the changes do not represent a fundamental overhaul, they do mark a clear shift from detailed, prescriptive rules towards a more flexible outcomes-based approach to consumer credit promotions, centred on the Consumer Duty.

The overarching requirement that financial promotions must be “fair, clear and not misleading” remains unchanged. However, firms will have greater discretion in how they meet this standard, with less reliance on detailed CONC rules and more emphasis on their own judgement. In practice, compliance will increasingly be assessed by reference to whether communications deliver good consumer outcomes – particularly in terms of consumer understanding under PRIN 2A.5. This In Practice article reviews the key changes.

26 JUL 2026

Is “name and shame” here to stay? Court dismisses challenge to FCA’s decision to publicly name

In this In Practice article the authors consider R (CIT (an anonymised company)) v Financial Conduct Authority (No.1) [2025] EWHC 2614 (Admin), and R (on the application of Claims Protection Agency Ltd) v Financial Conduct Authority (No. 2) [2025] EWHC 2615 (Admin) in which the High Court upheld the Financial Conduct Authority’s decision to name a regulated firm as the subject of an investigation.

8 FEB 2026

Court of Appeal decision on Motor Finance: lenders’ secondary liabilities

There has been significany commentary following the Court of Appeal's decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank LTD [2024] EWCV Civ 1282 regarding liability for undisclosed motor finance commissions. This is not surprising given the unexpected nature of the decision, its impact on the motor finance industry, and potential to impact other industries which use intermediaries remunerated by commissions from product providers. The decision will be reviewed by the Supreme Court in April.
This In Practice article examines the Court of Appeal’s approach to the lenders’ secondary liability for a credit broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, which we consider is ripe for criticism by the Supreme Court.

6 MAR 2025