Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

Feature

719
Go to page of 72 Next Pagination

EMIR 3.0, post-trade risk reduction services and the initial margin threshold: an unintended consequence

Post trade risk reduction (PTRR) services are not new to over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets. Through EMIR 3.0, policymakers acknowledged their function (reducing counterparty credit risk and/or operational risk) and fostered their usage by laying down the exemption from the clearing obligation. Admittedly, however, they did not consider any impact of PTRR on margin requirements for non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives. Performing PTRR – specifically portfolio rebalancing – is set to increase the aggregate average notional amount (AANA). As the latter is calculated to determine whether the initial margin (IM) threshold is exceeded, counterparties may opt to avoid using PTRR to avoid becoming subject to the burdensome IM requirements. An outcome not in line with the intention to foster PTRR.

09 June 2025

Cryptoasset regulation: a comparative analysis of UK and EU regimes

This article provides a comparative analysis of the regulatory approaches to cryptoassets in the UK and the EU, focusing on the UK’s recently proposed Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Cryptoassets) Order 2025 (UK Draft Order)1 and the EU’s Regulation 2023/1114 on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCAR). The article examines key differences in the approach, definition and categorisation of cryptoassets, scope of regulated activities, and the territorial application of each regime, concluding with a discussion of future outlook and regulatory ‘blind spots’ in each jurisdiction.

09 June 2025

Waving not drowning: Thames Water clarifies approach to out of the money creditors

In this article, the authors consider certain issues of principle decided or clarified by the Court of Appeal in the Thames Water  restructuring plan: Kington S.À.R.L. & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Holdings Lt d [2025] EWCA Civ 475. Namely: the requirement to consider the treatment of “out of the money” creditors when assessing whether the allocation of benefits under a plan is fair, and the meaning of the expression “restructuring surplus” or “benefits preserved or generated by the restructuring”.

09 June 2025

Climate risk in the commercial real estate market

In this article Matthew E Schernecke examines the effect of climate-related risk on the commercial real estate market, including the effect these risks will have on lenders’ and investors’ underwriting of loans and on the insurance coverage available in the market in respect of these risks, as well as possible implications on loan documentation.

09 June 2025

The LMA insolvency events of default clause: potential pitfalls and how to avoid them

This article considers the potential pitfalls in the LMA standard-form insolvency events of default clause and how the parties might seek to avoid them through targeted amendment and addition.

09 June 2025

No guarantees: UK corporation and withholding tax complexities of guarantees

The UK corporation and withholding tax treatment of guarantee arrangements and related payments is complex. Once the legal nature of the various guarantee relationships is understood, the UK tax analysis can be applied. However, even then difficulties can emerge in determining the UK tax corporation and withholding effect of guarantee arrangements given the lack of case law, guidance and legislative provisions specific to guarantees.

09 June 2025

Convertible bonds: a valuable funding tool in volatile markets

This article considers why, in volatile markets, the attractiveness of convertible bonds as part of the funding toolkit for both issuers and investors is enhanced. It goes on to describe some of the considerations relating to pre-emption rights and shareholder dilution that arise in the context of convertible bond transactions and various structural approaches that have been used to solve or mitigate these. Finally, it looks at how the technology used in the public convertible bond markets has an increasing role in bespoke transactions by private credit providers and financial investors.

09 June 2025

Ups and downs of the EU Benchmarks Regulation

Benchmarks play a crucial role in global financial and commodity markets. They measure different economic underlyings such as interest rates, currency exchange rates, baskets of shares and commodity prices, allowing market participants to transfer risk or gain exposure by referencing a commonly understood metric. This article traces how the EU Benchmarks Regulation was developed to safeguard the financial system, but introduced unintended risks, which are now being addressed. This article also considers the consequences of amendments to the EU Benchmarks Regulation, for regulated benchmark administrators and users.

09 June 2025

Proposed UK corporate redomiciliation: issues for lenders

Corporate redomiciliation is the process by which a company changes the place where it is incorporated, so as to become subject to the company law of a new jurisdiction whilst retaining its legal personality. In October 2024, a UK independent expert panel issued a report to the UK government setting out a proposed regime for corporate redomiciliation to and from the UK. This followed a government consultation on the principles of a corporate redomiciliation regime in October 2021. The government intends to consult in due course on a proposed regime design.
Many jurisdictions, including Singapore, Jersey, Luxembourg, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the State of Delaware, already have redomiciliation regimes and companies in the EU can move to another member state. Lenders may therefore have already considered the implications of a company redomiciling but each regime differs and it is therefore important to consider the UK proposals and their implications.

06 May 2025

Understanding debt finance in football: debt factoring and secured loans

In this article the authors examine the use of certain debt products, namely debt factoring of future revenue streams and secured loan facilities, in the football finance market.

06 May 2025
Go to page of 72 Next Pagination