Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email Amanda.Cohen2@lexisnexis.com.
Set-off versus . . . set-off? When close-out netting gets lost in translation
© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All rights reserved.
Close-out netting and set-off are distinct legal concepts, yet the distinction can easily be lost in translation across legal languages and systems. This article examines the risk of false equivalence in human and AI translation of these key terms and offers practical recommendations for OTC derivatives practitioners to preserve this critical distinction in cross-border contexts.
If you are already a User, sign in
Or you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Alternatively you can subscribe here to read unlimited content.
