Our articles are written by experts in their field and include individual barristers, solicitors, academics, judges, and leading firms in relevant areas of practice. JIBFL offers authoritative insights into global banking and financial law, providing essential updates for legal practitioners and policymakers. Covering key topics like lending, security interests, derivatives, debt capital markets, banking and finance related disputes, crypto, FinTech and financial regulation, JIBFL serves as a trusted resource for navigating complex legal challenges and staying informed in the financial sector. If you would like to contribute, please email .

In Practice

193
Go to page of 20 Next Pagination

AI lemons and the economics of unverifiable quality: Part 2 – new kinds of firms

Unverifiable quality - the Al lemons problem - is about to become a deep-technology problem rather than a product
problem. Part 1 of this article argued that Al's biggest commercial problem is not intelligence but credibility.
When Al is surfacing information (for example via an LLM interface) a user worries that the machine may be wrong; but
in that case its outputs can still be checked. The problem is merely whether we can trust an Al-generated answer. This is
how Al works in old kinds of firms: firms that employ mainly people use Al to improve operational efficiency and use people to check the answers. New kinds of firms, founded on machine intelligence and labour, require us to consider whether we can trust an Al-generated action; in the agentic economy a machine may be wrong or unauthorised and still act.
Both parts of this article consider trust but, in this part, concerning the machine (or agentic) economy, we look at trust
through automated verification: systems that test machine action, machine authority, and machine evidence, and thereby develop legally informed systems that test the boundaries within which agents act.Old kinds of firms employ mainly people; new kinds of firms employ mainly machines.

26 July 2026

The proposed reforms to the financial promotions regime for consumer credit: a move to an outcomes-based approach

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has proposed reforms to the financial promotions regime for consumer credit in its recent consultation plaper CP26/15. while the changes do not represent a fundamental overhaul, they do mark a clear shift from detailed, prescriptive rules towards a more flexible outcomes-based approach to consumer credit promotions, centred on the Consumer Duty.

The overarching requirement that financial promotions must be “fair, clear and not misleading” remains unchanged. However, firms will have greater discretion in how they meet this standard, with less reliance on detailed CONC rules and more emphasis on their own judgement. In practice, compliance will increasingly be assessed by reference to whether communications deliver good consumer outcomes – particularly in terms of consumer understanding under PRIN 2A.5. This In Practice article reviews the key changes. 

26 July 2026

SMF7 extension: from conduct to control

In this In Practice article the authors consider the practical implications of extending the SMF7 role to controllers.

26 July 2026

DeFi exploits, on-chain interventions and the private key: recent developments in cryptoasset recovery

The author examines the significance of the Arbitrum Security Council’s recent decision to freeze and transfer misappropriated cryptoassets without the private key. The author assesses the implications of this intervention for the principle of “not your keys, not your coins”, the blurring of boundaries between custodial and non-custodial wallets, and the broader ramifications for cryptoasset enforcement and recovery in the English courts and beyond.

29 June 2026

Withholding tax: treaty shopping – or not?

In this In Practice article, the authors consider the recent Court of Appeal decision in Revenue and Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC  [2026] EWCA Civ 461 and its implications for practitioners. 

29 June 2026

Raising the resilience bar: UK operational incident and third-party reporting reforms

New UK requirements will introduce a unified regulatory regime for operational incident reporting and reporting of material third‑party arrangements (MTPAs) from 18 March 2027. The rules, which are designed to align as far as possible with international regimes, introduce aligned definitions, templates, and processes for notifying regulators of serious operational incidents above a defined threshold and for registering and notifying new or significantly changed MTPAs. We take a look at the aims of the new regime, highlight key points to note and discuss implementation considerations for firms.

23 May 2026

Golden Power 2026: navigating the latest Italian FDI screening developments

In this In Practice article the authors consider Italy’s Law No. 4 of 15 January 2026 which amends its foreign investment screening mechanism. The authors assess how the reform materially reshapes the procedural framework applicable to transactions concerning Italian banks, insurers and other financial institutions, as well as recent judicial developments affecting notification triggers for security interests in financing transactions and draw comparison with the UK National Security and Investment Act 2021.

23 May 2026

AI lemons and the economics of unverifiable quality: Part 1 – old kinds of firms

The mainstream adoption of generative AI systems has raised the stakes around the issue of unverifiable quality. For lawyers and most clients the hard part with AI is verification, not performance. Generative AI is world changing but it is not currently possible to reliably predict when its mistakes will be trivial or obvious and when its mistakes will be catastrophic or not apparent. For investors the related problem is that verification of quality (in other words, what is investible) requires a mix of expertise and experience that is rare.

22 May 2026

ECCTA 2023: implications for finance transactions

A key aim of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) is to reform the UK’s prevention, detection and prosecution measures for economic crime, particularly through strengthening corporate transparency and ensuring that legitimate business activities are not abused for illicit purposes. Recently core provisions have come into force and new guidance has emerged providing further insight and clues as to the practical implications and potential risks that ECCTA poses for workflows on loan finance transactions.

05 May 2026

Referral to the Upper Tribunal: worth the risk?

The authors consider recent decisions in which the Upper Tribunal has closely scrutinised FCA penalty calculations and reduced fines. They consider the implications for firms and the regulator.

05 May 2026
Go to page of 20 Next Pagination